The Rules for Cross Examination India provide a plethora of opportunities to a lawyer. There are certain rules, which are to be followed carefully in each examination that a client faces. The first one is undoubtedly the question which should not be repeated. There are various reasons why questions should not be repeated in a case. However, it is the lawyer’s responsibility to tell the client about these reasons.
The second rule is that there should be no direct and personal questions. As such, this rule prevents lawyers from asking irrelevant questions during examinations. It is the job of the lawyer to enable his/her client to answer the question in the best possible manner.
In order to prepare properly for a cross examination, it is essential for a lawyer to get acquainted with the various techniques which can be used. There are several ways by, which a lawyer can do this. The most common techniques are: direct questioning, use of irrelevant facts etc.
One thing that makes the Rules for Cross Examination India very important is that they have been designed keeping in view the goals and objectives of the examination process. The first goal of any examination is to prove the innocence of the client. As such, it is the intention of the Rules for Cross Examination India to help a person whose innocence is established beyond doubt. In order to accomplish this end, there must be rules that govern the conduct of the examination process.
The second objective is to aid the client in getting rid of the points that have been raised against him. The rules have been laid down so that the lawyer does not become confused while working on the case. In this regard, the lawyer must inform the client about every fact that is relevant in the case so that he/she does not have to refer to other documents that will only confuse him.
A person can also request another lawyer to take over the case when he finds that he is unable to proceed with the proceedings. This request must be made within two weeks of the lawyer finding out that the client is being investigated for the alleged offence. The investigation can either be done by the police or the private detective agencies. In most of the cases, the lawyer will be informed about the precise nature of the charges against him and the proceedings that are to be taken against him. The rules for cross examination in this case are different from those followed in a criminal trial.
When a person is examined under these rules, there are certain questions that cannot be answered by just anyone. These questions are asked by the investigating officer who is appointed by the court to carry out this task. If an accused cannot furnish satisfactory answers to these queries, he/she must be excluded from the case. Under normal circumstances, the accused is allowed a defense lawyer to cross examine the prosecution lawyer.
The investigating officer will question all witnesses about the crime committed. However, the defense lawyer may cross examine these witnesses to prove that the crime did not take place. There are many other rules for cross examination in India. However, the rules for examining witnesses in private detective cases are different.
In this case, both the lawyers will be posing as experts of their clients. The rules for examinees vary from one state to another. There are many private detectives operating in India and the rules of evidence in this case are almost the same as those of courts across the country. In other words, both the lawyers and the private detectives have to prove their reliability before the court of law.
There are specific rules under which the questions are asked by the investigating officer. For instance, if the investigating officer is sure that the witness whose deposition is going to be recorded in court, will definitely give his/her true and correct answers, then the person who asks the question will receive a five-minute recess. This recess is observed by both the parties and they can then proceed to ask questions till they get all the information that has to be clarified. The rules for examinations in private detective cases are almost the same as the rules of examinations in a court of law.